[ad_1]
Refusing to entertain Sharma’s plea for clubbing of FIRs lodged in various states against her for the remark, the bench held that the comment was made either for cheap publicity, political agenda or some nefarious activities.
“She actually has a loose tongue and has made all kinds of irresponsible statements on TV and set the entire country on fire. Yet, she claims to be a lawyer of 10 years standing… She should have immediately apologised for her comments to the whole country,” the court said.
Following the court’s observations, Bollywood actor Anupam Kher took to his social media handle to share a cryptic tweet that read, “Your Honour! Do something honourable about your HONOUR!”
Your Honour! Do something honourable about your HONOUR!
— Anupam Kher (@AnupamPKher) 1656669617000
It is unclear if the actor made the remarks against the court in regard to Sharma or on another topic. While the tweet gained a lot of likes and some fans couldn’t ‘agree’ more, there were those who questioned, “What does this even mean?”
What does this even mean? https://t.co/0IN4mvw3F9
— Iqbal Mohammed (@iqqumufc) 1656673617000
“Ye contempt of court nahi hai?” another asked.
Ye contempt of court nehi hai? https://t.co/1RuSTiGlcf
— C Goutam (@CGoutam2) 1656685787000
Another replied to the post and said, “Yes… Only criticizing is not enough, anything less than arrest can’t be accepted.”
Yes.. Only criticizing is not enough,, anything less than arrest can’t be accepted.. https://t.co/CqUzNbPzQg
— Dr Jitendra Aggarwal (@DrJKaggarwal03) 1656674857000
Another trolled the actor for his comment saying, “Now courts need to consult Anupam Kher for making decisions.”
Now courts need to consult Anupam Kher for making decisions. https://t.co/KSqdISiVVi
— Vishesh Arora (@vishesharora_) 1656703832000
Sharma’s remark against the Prophet during a TV debate triggered protests across the country and drew sharp reactions from many Gulf countries. The BJP subsequently suspended her from the party.
“These remarks are very disturbing and smack of arrogance. What is her business to make such remarks? These remarks have led to unfortunate incidents in the country…These people are not religious. They do not have respect for other religions. These remarks were made for cheap publicity or political agenda or some other nefarious activities”, the bench said.
The court’s observations against the suspended BJP leader come in the backdrop of the brutal murder of a tailor in Udaipur by two men, who had posted videos online, claiming that they were avenging an insult to Islam.
While refusing to entertain Sharma’s plea for clubbing of FIRs, a vacation bench of Justices Surya Kant and JB Pardiwala allowed her to withdraw the plea.
“She has a threat or she has become a security threat? The way she has ignited emotions across the country… this lady is single-handedly responsible for what is happening in the country,” the bench said when Sharma’s lawyer Maninder Singh pointed out that she was facing threats to life.
The bench further said, “the way she ignited emotions across the country has led to unfortunate incidents. This lady is single-handedly responsible for what is happening in the country. We saw the debate”.
After the court’s unsparing criticism of Sharma, the Congress said the Supreme Court has rightly called out Sharma for being responsible for igniting emotions across the country with her remark against the Prophet, and that the ruling party should hang its head in shame.
.
[ad_2]
Source link