Either the owners of the flat or the building management felt that the lock-in period implemented in the deal would be too small if they said yes to Pant for just 180 days; they wanted someone to occupy the flat for a longer time. Our source adds, “But Pant was clear that he didn’t want to reside in that flat for more than 6 months. So, the deal did not go through.”
Yesterday, Urvashi was in the news. Well, she definitely knows how to create news. And it is obvious that she reads the news as well. On the Rishabh front, the lady in question continues to make news ever since she said Rishabh Pant once waited for her in a hotel hobby for almost 10 hours. After it seemed that she recently said ‘sorry’ during an interview when asked about Rishabh, yesterday she issued a clarification saying that wasn’t the case.
Coming back to the Urvashi-Pant flat story. Adds the source, “Naturally, Pant was disappointed. But there’s little that he could do.”
Did Ms Rautela know all this? We don’t think so. But all said and done, Rautela reads news as we said earlier, and we bet she’s reading this as well- FIRST and EXCLUSIVE on ETimes.
